A neoclassical courthouse beside the walls and tower of Jerusalem’s Citadel at dusk (composite image)

Legal War Room · Front one

Fighting Terrorism

Bankrupting terrorism, one lawsuit at a time. Even the most secretive terror organization has one central weakness: money. Shurat HaDin traces the assets of terror groups and their sponsors, and uses the courts to freeze and seize them on behalf of the victims.

Legal Actions
415
Plaintiffs Represented
70,000
Legal War Room Lawyers
600
Intern Students
350

Tracking and blocking terror financing

Even the most secretive terror organizations share one central weakness: money.

Without an economic infrastructure, a terror organization cannot recruit operatives, buy weapons and communications equipment, train its people, or build the civilian infrastructure that supports its activity. A steady flow of funding is essential to the orderly, systematic operation of terror networks. By taking legal action, Shurat HaDin has succeeded in stopping money that once flowed freely to terror organizations.

Lawyers on the front line

From the 1990s, Western countries passed laws that allow victims of terror to sue the regimes and bodies that give material or financial support to terror groups. These include banks that provide financial services to terror organizations, and charities that raise money for terror under a humanitarian cover.

Lawyers became central players in the campaign to stop the flow of money to terror, and victims and their families gained the chance to fight back in the legal arena. Shurat HaDin specializes in tracing the assets and bank accounts of terror organizations, then seizing and attaching them through the courts, which restrains and disrupts their operations.

“It is an endless battle, but the only way to weaken terror groups is to harm their funding… If we cut off their money supply, we can bring about their downfall.”

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, founder and president, Shurat HaDin

Terrorists are a product of terror financing

At its core, a terror organization is a business. Day after day, terror groups raise, invest, allocate and transfer money for their purposes. According to documents seized and exposed during Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, the financial support devoted to terror was ongoing and large-scale.

Terror operatives are shaped from a young age. Incitement begins in elementary school and continues through youth movements, summer camps, clinics and community centers, presenting attacks as heroism and their perpetrators as heroes. The payments to terrorists’ families, sizable sums paid over many years, turn the choice of terror into an economically worthwhile one.

An explosive vest or a car bomb costs little on its own. Training suicide bombers and terror operatives, however, is a long and very expensive process. That is why stopping the money that funds terror is such a significant course of action.

Key facts

Braun v. Iran · 2017
Judgment against Iran and Syria for their material support of Hamas
Qatar suit · 2021
Suit against Qatar and Qatari banks, for 120 plaintiffs
PA and PLO ruling · 2019
17 attacks that Arafat and his underlings directed and financed, per the Jerusalem District Court
Who we sue
Terror groups, state sponsors, banks, charities and money changers
Legal tools
Anti-Terrorism Act suits, judgments against state sponsors, asset liens and restraining notices

Fund the next case

Every lawsuit is funded by supporters. Donations are tax-deductible in the US, Israel and many other countries.

Donate

Four strategies

How we follow the money

Each strategy is drawn from cases on Shurat HaDin’s docket.

  1. The Arab Bank name and emblem on a building facade

    01

    Suing the banks that move terror money

    Victims of the Second Intifada’s attacks sued Arab Bank under the Anti-Terrorism Act in the Eastern District of New York, in cases that joined thousands of plaintiffs. Other suits have targeted Bank of China, National Westminster Bank, Crédit Lyonnais, UBS and American Express Bank.

    On the docket: The Arab Bank cases, Wultz v. Bank of China, Weiss v. National Westminster Bank

  2. The flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran

    02

    Holding state sponsors to account

    Iran, Syria and North Korea have all been sued for their material support of terror. In January 2017 the family of Chaya Zissel Braun, a three-month-old killed in a 2014 attack on the Jerusalem light rail, won a US court judgment against Iran and Syria for their support of Hamas.

    On the docket: Braun v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Bennett v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Kim v. North Korea

  3. An Iran Air Boeing 747 in flight

    03

    Seizing assets to pay the judgments

    When Iran agreed to buy 80 airplanes from Boeing, Shurat HaDin served Boeing with a citation restraining Iran’s interest on behalf of terror victims holding unpaid judgments. It has gone after Iran’s airport fees from Lufthansa, sued the INSTEX trade channel in France, and worked to seize flotilla boats to compensate victims.

    On the docket: The Boeing–Iran deal, Lufthansa restraining notices, Lawsuit against INSTEX

  4. Israeli shekel banknotes fanned out, 200 and 100 New Shekel notes

    04

    Cutting off Hamas’s money

    In June 2021 Shurat HaDin filed a lawsuit on behalf of 120 plaintiffs against Qatar and Qatari banks for funding Hamas. It has sued the Jerusalem money changers who moved money from Iran to Hamas, warned the Coinbase exchange into closing Hamas’s accounts, and moved to seize the Palestinian Authority’s “pay for slay” stipends. In 2025 it also went after the Al Jazeera network under the Anti-Terrorism Act, alleging material support to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

    On the docket: Qatari banks and charities, Hamas and the money changers, Coinbase closes Hamas accounts, The Al Jazeera lawsuit

On the docket

Selected cases on this front

Years come from each case record, from Shurat HaDin’s 2025 annual report, or, where marked, from press reports of the filing. Every title opens its source on Shurat HaDin’s site.

The full case archive
Selected terror-financing cases
YearCaseWhat happened
2025 Shurat HaDin’s Legal War Room In the wake of the October 7 attack, Shurat HaDin launched its Legal War Room (LWR), harnessing legal talent around the world, to assist Israel at…
2025 Shurat HaDin Pursued Prosecutions of the October 7 Massacre’s Terrorists Shurat HaDin petitioned Israel's High Court to force long-overdue transparency over the detention of Hamas terrorists captured after October 7.
2025 A Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Victory: Restoring the Right to Sue the PA In June 2025, in a case brought during the days of the Second Intifada terror victims’ families secured a momentous victory when the U.S. Supreme…
2025 Suing Al-Jazeera for Ties to Hamas & Palestinian Islamic Jihad Terror victims filed a major lawsuit on behalf of American victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre, accusing Al-Jazeera of providing material support…
2025 Shurat HaDin Sues ICC Chief Karim Khan Families of three Israeli hostages held in Gaza have filed a lawsuit in Jerusalem against International Criminal Court (ICC) Chief Prosecutor Karim…
2025 The U.S. Department of Justice Strips UNRWA of Immunity In a crucial development in our ongoing case against UNRWA, the U.S. Department of Justice officially revoked the agency’s immunity, clearing the way…
2025 Renewed Push to Extradite Sbarro Bomber Ahlam Al-Tamimi, the unrepentant Palestinian terrorist behind the 2001 Sbarro restaurant bombing, remains free in Jordan.
2025 Shurat HaDin Investigates & Exposes Threats in South Africa Following the discovery of a suspicious explosive device near a Jewish community facility in Cape Town, Shurat HaDin conducted an independent…
2025as reported The Al Jazeera lawsuit An Anti-Terrorism Act suit for American victims of October 7, alleging the network gave Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad material support. Pending; per the 2025 annual report, Al Jazeera is seeking dismissal.
2025 The US Supreme Court on suing the PA and PLO In a case brought by families of Second Intifada terror victims, the Court unanimously restores Americans’ right to sue the Palestinian Authority and the PLO under the Anti-Terrorism Act.
2026as reported The Samerano family’s suit against UNRWA The parents of hostage Yonatan Samerano sue the UN agency over its employee’s involvement in the October 7 attack.

Read a case in full: the Red Cross lawsuit

The Legal War Room

The other fronts

Legal War Room overview
  • Front two

    Combating Antisemitism

    Legal action against BDS, campus hate and incitement on social media.

    Explore the front
  • Front three

    Defending IDF Soldiers

    Answering false war-crimes allegations at the International Criminal Court.

    Explore the front
  • Front four

    Training the Next Generation

    Twice-yearly internships that put law students to work on actual cases.

    Internship programs

Help us bankrupt terror

Every lawsuit against terror and its financiers is funded by supporters like you.